Back in the 1980s I did not believe that India was a real democracy. I remember explaining to a family friend who is Indian that no country that has been ruled by a single family for 90 percent of the time since independence can be democratic. It was really an elected monarchy. She mentioned the Kennedy family (and later she could have mentioned the Bushes as well). I simply pointed out that the Kennedys had held the presidency for a total of less than three years. When one adds the widespread corruption in Indian politics and the widespread sectarian pogroms that broke out in 1947, in 1984, and in 2002 one can make a very good case that India is not really a democracy by Western standards. But is this fair to India? After all, India is not located either culturally or geographically in the West but in South Asia. So let's examine what the standards for governance are in the region.
A blog covering contemporary international relations with a focus on the Arab-Israeli conflict, Israeli politics and Northern Ireland and Asian interstate politics.
Israel/Palestine: The Politics of a Two-State Solution
- Israel/Palestine and the Politics of a Two-State Solution
- When Peace Fails: Lessons from Belfast for the Middle East
Showing posts with label Bangladesh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bangladesh. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)